Your intermittent briefing on the reconciliation negotiations that Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) largely killed is now at least briefly back for an update. What can I say — it’s Manchin’s world, we’re just living in it.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) on Monday pitted himself against his staunchest ally so far on all things stymying Democrats’ hopes and dreams: Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ). 

If you cast your mind back to the reconciliation negotiations, you’ll remember that a particularly fun obstacle for Democrats to try to navigate was that Manchin and Sinema each had different and distinct dealbreakers in the package 

One of Sinema’s was refusal to hike taxes on the wealthy and corporations. Manchin, on the other hand, is all for tax reform. One of the only things he’ll say concretely is that he dislikes and wants to undo former President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts. 

“Why can’t we just get a good solid tax plan that works?” Manchin asked the Wall Street Journal in an article published Monday. “That’s the first thing to do.”

The primary stumbling block for Democrats’ tax proposals last fall was Sinema. 

“I respect her and what her concerns may be, but I think basically our financial situation is getting worse, not better, so maybe we can take another look at it,” Manchin added of Sinema. “I would hope so.”

Manchin and Sinema have hobbled the party on this package in such a humiliating and high-visibility way that Democrats would take basically whatever Manchin will give them at this point. But a potential Manchin vs. Sinema showdown on taxes would be fascinating — especially since the senator from Arizona has not yet shown a proclivity for being out on a branch alone.

On top of that, she’d be siloed on an issue that is essentially a litmus test for Democrats — raising taxes, some way somehow, on the wealthy. While she probably has drawn one already (looking at you, Rep. Gallego), staking her political identity on refusal to raise taxes on the rich and corporations will almost assuredly draw a primary challenge.

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Just a few days after defeating a Trump-backed primary challenger, Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) fired the partisan election…

In an escalation of the conservative media’s attacks on the judge who signed the search warrant for the FBI’s raid…

After a week of attacking the Justice Department, claiming victimhood, and offering nonsensical defenses of the classified documents that were…

When former President Donald Trump first announced the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago residence, many Republican lawmakers rhetorically rushed to…